Chinese art has played a pivotal role in fostering cultural exchange, shaping creative industries and inspiring audiences across the United States. Yet today, the future of this exchange faces mounting challenges. As H.R. 7476 concludes its journey in the current Congress, incoming President Donald J. Trump’s proposed 60% tariffs on Chinese imports and heightened restrictions on international partnerships signal an intensifying shift in U.S.-China cultural relations.
Exchange Under Seige
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s ruling political regime, has increasingly used cultural programmes, such as Confucius Institutes and museum exchanges, to project a carefully managed image of China abroad. An image that masks its authoritarian practices while promoting its role as a benevolent global leader. While current legislative efforts may expire with this Congress, these incoming broader policy proposals suggest continued pressure on cultural exchange.
For Curator Cat (speaking under a pseudonym due to security concerns in Hong Kong), activist and founder of the Hong Kong XR Museum, the stakes are personal. As a native of Hong Kong, a former British Overseas Territory handed back to China in 1997, she has witnessed firsthand how cultural initiatives can be used to reshape identity. Hong Kong, with its unique history, legal system and social values, is now in the process of being reabsorbed into mainland China—a move that highlights how cultural plurality can be eroded under political pressure. “There’s a legitimate need to recognise how the CCP uses culture strategically,” Curator Cat explains. “However, we must ask whether this legislation will actually achieve its aims or whether it risks punishing the very institutions that are striving to foster mutual understanding.”
This tension lies at the heart of an escalating debate: As policy proposals become increasingly restrictive, how can museums maintain their ability to educate and inspire through access to Chinese art?”
Exhibitions That Transformed Perspectives
For decades, American museums have hosted landmark exhibitions that celebrate China’s extraordinary artistic heritage. One of the most notable was “The Great Bronze Age of China” at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in 1980. Showcasing ancient artefacts from the Zhou and Shang Dynasties, the exhibition offered an unprecedented glimpse into early Chinese civilisation, sparking widespread public and scholarly interest.
More recently, exhibitions like “Guo Pei: Couture Fantasy” at the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco have celebrated contemporary Chinese innovation. Visitors encountered intricately designed couture that married traditional Chinese craftsmanship with modern fashion, proving Chinese culture’s dynamism and global relevance.
These exhibitions and others like them, bridge past and present, East and West, fostering cultural understanding. Yet Curator Cat offers a cautionary perspective: “While these exchanges are powerful and important, we cannot ignore that the CCP sometimes uses cultural initiatives as strategic tools to shape foreign perceptions. That’s where the line between soft power and cultural enrichment becomes blurred.”
The concern underlying H.R. 7476 is valid. The CCP has strategically invested in cultural programmes like Confucius Institutes, which position themselves as neutral spaces for education and exchange but often promote Beijing-aligned narratives. Similarly, Chinese cultural exhibitions can, intentionally or not, reinforce a controlled and curated image of China.
Curator Cat explains: “The CCP’s push to homogenise Hong Kong under a unified ‘Chinese’ identity shows how cultural plurality can be eroded. The same dynamics can influence foreign audiences, where cultural programming subtly aligns with Beijing’s broader political agenda.”
Cultural Heritage, Not Political Leverage
Bridge Building, Not Wall Raising
Thoughtful Oversight, Not Blanket Restrictions
Preservation Access, Not Political Barriers
At the same time, she warns against blanket restrictions that may ultimately punish institutions rather than addressing the root of the issue. “Museums are not political tools; they are spaces of education and exploration. By imposing sweeping barriers on cultural exchange, we risk undermining their ability to showcase art that deepens our understanding of China as a civilisation—beyond the CCP.”
The Threat to Museums and Communities
The convergence of expiring legislation and new policy proposals signals a pivotal shift in U.S.-China cultural relations. As H.R. 7476 concludes its journey in the current Congress, the incoming administration’s proposed 60% tariffs and heightened restrictions could create even more significant barriers. These mounting pressures risk disrupting the very relationships and programmes that have enriched cultural dialogue for decades. Exhibitions of Chinese artifacts, often years in the making, could face not just regulatory hurdles but prohibitive costs. This could jeopardize collaborative research and curatorial partnerships essential to presenting Chinese art with nuance and accuracy.
Museums play a vital role in fostering connections, especially within Chinese-American communities. Events and exhibitions create spaces to celebrate heritage, spark dialogue and strengthen ties between cultures. Curator Cat underscores this point: “Education and cultural understanding can stem anti-Chinese sentiment by distinguishing between the Chinese people and the CCP’s actions. Legislation like H.R. 7476 risks cutting off that bridge instead of making it stronger.
While vigilance against cultural soft power is essential, the growing trend toward restrictive policies raises serious concerns. The combination of H.R. 7476’s proposed requirements and the incoming administration’s announced plans for broad Chinese import restrictions could have far-reaching unintended consequences:
- Restricting Access: Limiting imports of Chinese art could deprive audiences of opportunities to engage with China’s vast and diverse cultural heritage. With potential 60% tariffs looming, even routine acquisitions and temporary exhibitions could become financially untenable.
- Punishing Institutions: Museums, which are often underfunded and reliant on long-standing international partnerships, could face increased bureaucratic burdens or lose access altogether. The compounded effect of multiple restrictive policies could overwhelm institutional resources.
- Alienating Communities: Chinese-American communities, for whom these exhibitions serve as vital connections to their heritage, could feel marginalised. This impact could deepen as multiple policy barriers accumulate.
Instead of sweeping restrictions, solutions might include increased transparency requirements, rigorous oversight of partnerships and greater investment in collaborations with diaspora artists and scholars. “We need to address influence without dismantling the entire structure of cultural exchange,” says Curator Cat. “Museums can remain vigilant while still championing genuine understanding.”
A Shared Future
The story of Chinese art is far larger than the CCP. It spans millennia, shaping global history, philosophy, design and innovation. By presenting Chinese art in its full complexity, museums invite audiences to engage with China’s contributions to the world and appreciate the interplay of cultures across borders.
For Curator Cat, the preservation of cultural dialogue is critical: “Recognising cultural plurality is key. Museums have a responsibility to present China’s artistic legacy authentically and critically. If we lose access to these works, we lose an opportunity to see the world—and ourselves—more fully.”
As the future of U.S.-China cultural collaboration hangs in the balance, it is essential to reaffirm museums’ role as spaces where art transcends politics. Whether through ancient bronzes or contemporary couture, Chinese art helps us better understand a civilisation that continues to shape our world. Addressing legitimate concerns about cultural influence requires nuance, not barriers. Museums must remain spaces of truth, education and connection—now more than ever.
Chinese art acquisition policyChinese art documentation requirementsChinese art exhibitions USChinese art in Western museumsChinese artifact regulationsChinese cultural heritage preservationChinese cultural programs USChinese-American cultural heritagecultural exchange legislationcultural exchange restrictionscultural institution compliancecultural preservation policyCultural soft power museumsinternational art exchangemuseum collection accessMuseum collection managementmuseum collection regulationsmuseum compliance requirementsmuseum international partnershipsmuseum policy changes 2025museum policy impactmuseum regulatory changesmuseum tariff impactUS-China cultural relations
